bugshaw: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] bugshaw at 05:16pm on 06/02/2007
Is one's cardiovascular system related to one's metabolism?

I ask because I had a session with a personal trainer at the gym today (they had a free offer). It started with testing my range of motion (generally excellent), looking for imbalances (my back muscles are tighter than my abs, which surprised me and affects my posture, also my lats and hip flexors), asking stuff, then we went on to do some exercises.

He had me try a couple of cable pull exercises for chest and torso strengthening, and squats with a gym ball against a wall, which I would next do as a circuit with no gaps to try to exert myself. He lent me a heart rate monitor, and I got started! Halfway through the third exercise he took a reading - "80! I've never seen a heart rate that low. You must have one hell of a cardiovascular system!"

It got up to 150+ after a minute or so flat out on the cross trainer.

If my CV system is that efficient, could that be one reason I find it hard to lose weight? Does my low heart rate mean my metabolism doesn't get kicked up a notch? Or does the body not work this way?
There are 5 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] del-c.livejournal.com at 06:53pm on 06/02/2007
IANAD, nor do I play one on LJ, but I think that when your metabolism demands more pints per minute, your heart could respond to the demand in three ways:
  • More pressure
  • More pints per beat
  • More beats per minute
As it happens, your heart muscle has only so much force in it to give per ounce of muscle, and it can't change its size on short notice, so it responds not by pumping the same number of pints with more pressure, or more pints per beat, but the same number of pints per beat, against the same pressure, with more beats per minute.

So a high heart rate implies you haven't been exercising, your heart muscle mass is small, you have miles of extra capillary (fatty tissue has capillaries that need feeding too) and your veins and arterioles are narrow. A low heart rate implies you've been exercising, your heart is well-muscled, your vessels are wide, and the total mileage in your system is low.

(if I hadn't missed both the weekly repeats of Dr. Alice Roberts: Don't Die Young when she did Hearts last week (it's Eyes tonight) then I probably wouldn't have to guess)

Since, I believe, blood flow is laminar in all but the largest vessels, length and diameter of your circulatory system should be related to the volume flow and pressure by the Hagen-Poiseuille equation, which I'm not going to look up and try to render in LJ's HTML, but IIRC, the flow for a given pressure goes as something like the fifth or eighth power of diameter, so a little clearing of the tubes should go a long way.
 
posted by [identity profile] purpletigron.livejournal.com at 07:59pm on 06/02/2007
My brother's resting heart rate is about 46 bpm. But yes, good. He also has a very efficient metabolism, but does shedloads of exercise. Not sure about the relationships there, wrong kind of Dr. sorry.
 
posted by [identity profile] hawkida.livejournal.com at 12:45am on 07/02/2007
I have wondered this. At rest I am between 48 and 58bpm and it seems to me that means my heart does fewer pumps therefore less energy is required. Entirely supposition though.
 
posted by [identity profile] maryread.livejournal.com at 06:46am on 07/02/2007
Good to have low resting heart rate (although this guy has to be a new fellow in the training business not to have seen that). Also if it recovers from exercise fast. That is, after you get it up over 150, which is a reasonable training rate for person your age, then when you stop, how fast does it slow down again. Back when I started doing the bicycle thing it took several minutes for my heart rate to go down again when I stopped, but over time, it went down to less than a minute.

How much fuel you burn (metabolism) has also to do with endocrine system. As you get older, or diet repeatedly, that gets more efficient too. Horribly complicated tho. Adrenals, pituitary, all that.

Must go dig out my heart monitor and take it walking. It is more fun than pedometer.
 
posted by [identity profile] bibliofile.livejournal.com at 10:40am on 07/02/2007
To answer the question, I don't *think* so. Cardiovascular is pretty much plumbing and circulation. Metabolism is processing of energy. Death interferes equally strongly with both processes, but it's correlation not causation.

(IANAMP)

September

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21 22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30