posted by
bugshaw at 12:57am on 19/03/2008
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
indexed on Arthur C. Clarke.
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25 |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I'm reading a recent Hugo-Nebula winner ('Roleback' if anyone's interested.), given to me by a friend who really wants me to to like it, but the characters are so leaden, there's so much propagandizing - that its just kind of DUH! The only character I warm to is the robot.
(no subject)
Part of the reason things are classified as SF is the dealing with ideas, exploration of alternate societies, technologies, etc - things external to the characters' own heads.
(no subject)
What really pisses me off is that this egregious book I'm slogging through WON! the Hugo and Nebula awards. Where are the standards?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
He seems to have 'fans' as opposed to 'people who read his books and enjoy them and think they're good'.
(no subject)
Lucky you, however. I'm going to have a tomato and salmon salad and watch 2-3 Torchwoods - I've been saving them up - should get my mind onto something else to be irritated by......
My parting comment however: a book about what it means to be human and the most interesting and believable character is.... the robot! DUH!!!
(no subject)
(For some reason I'm thinking of the novel that was written without the letter E here..)
I'm currently reading the Baron-Cohen book on extreme brains and I'm starting to think that in the case of lots of SF, both the author and target audience are such extreme systematisers that character development as conventionally understood is more alien to them than actual aliens. Or - more reasonably - just not a priority to the readers.
I just took a look through the list of Hugo and Nebula winners. Apart from noticing that I've not read most of those from the past 20 years and that there is considerable overlap between the lists, The Terminal Man jumped out at me. I've read it and didn't think much of it; I suspect that like Rollback it got the award for dealing with "big ideas" like "what it means to be human" ...
What's your favourite SF novel?
(no subject)
Earthsea series - especially the last one, The Other Wind are books I read over and over. although now that I start to think about it. Anne McCaffrey's, 'The Ship Who Sang' still makes me cry every time I re-read it. I've given away over 8 copies to new friends, often my students.
Maybe its a guy thing - they like all that exposition with little or no real emotion to make them uncomfortable. Although I do like William Gibson.
(no subject)
(no subject)