He was right - No it doesn't. But what it does have to be - is well written. Clarke was a great writer, first and foremost. In my mind, what's wrong with so much (not all) of current sci-fi writing is that the authors substitute exposition for real character development creating a dulling kind of distancing.
I'm reading a recent Hugo-Nebula winner ('Roleback' if anyone's interested.), given to me by a friend who really wants me to to like it, but the characters are so leaden, there's so much propagandizing - that its just kind of DUH! The only character I warm to is the robot.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm reading a recent Hugo-Nebula winner ('Roleback' if anyone's interested.), given to me by a friend who really wants me to to like it, but the characters are so leaden, there's so much propagandizing - that its just kind of DUH! The only character I warm to is the robot.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject