Cambridge Picturehouse/Cineworld under threat : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
| 21 |
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
(no subject)
I wonder if a management buy out is a possibility (if it makes a profit, it ought to be possible for them to get finance)?
The co-op idea is interesting - I think it could be registered as an asset of community value under the Localism Act, which would give a right to buy to any suitably constituted community group.
(no subject)
Cineworld is a relatively recent addition to Cambridge, so (TTBOMK) the merger was arguably a reversion to the situation before it existed, i.e. 2 cinema owners in the area rather than 3.
(no subject)
Vue + Picturehouse
2003 Vue + Picturehouse + Cineworld
2012 Vue + {Picturehouse + Cineworld}
and if they have to sell one it likely won't be the moneymaker Cineworld so we may end up with
Vue + Cineworld so the same number of cinemas but massive reduction in choice
(no subject)
Victoria, ABC/Canon/MGM/etc., Arts Cinema
ABC/Canon/MGM/etc., Arts Cinema
Vue, ABC/Canon/MGM/etc., Arts Cinema
Vue, Arts Cinema
Vue, Arts Picturehouse
Cineworld, Vue, Arts Picturehouse
So three would appear to be the stable number of cinemas since 1986 (when the Kinema closed), with brief periods reduced to two. In particular, the Arts Picturehouse opened (sharing the old Regal Cinema building with the Wetherspoons) within a few weeks of the Arts CInema closing. There is no suggestion that an arthouse cinema isn't viable in Cambridge - quite the contrary. I would assume the Picturehouse would be sold as a going concern, either to another chain or independent ownership. Obviously the uncertainty is troubling, but I can't see closure being an option anyone wants.
(no subject)
(no subject)