posted by
bugshaw at 11:05am on 16/02/2007
I was pondering some of the common difficulties in hugging, and contemplating doing an illustrated book in the style of Kathleen Keating's The Little Book of Hugs (not using camels as they are difficult to draw hugging!).
When I fumble a hug in clumsy and graceless fashion, a typical failure mode is not achieving the complementary arm configuration. I approach - the huggee approaches. We raise our arms in preparation! I (say) have my left arm up (to go over the shoulder) and my right arm low (to go round the waist/torso): the huggee has mirrored this. Oh no! We're going to clash! Quickly, I move my left arm down and my right arm up so we will fit together - just as the huggee adjusts their position to fit mine! Aieee! By then it's too late and one person ends up smacking the other upside the nose with their elbow, or you do manage the hug but with one arm of the four crushed between you in a most uncomfortable angle.
It seems common for people to have a preferred angle, or chirality, for hugging. The semaphore flag code seems
a) an excellent way of denoting this, and
b) opens the mind to new hugging possibilities!
At first I thought the best representation of the hug approach pattern was one arm high, one arm low (the other positions are up, down, and out). This can be seen in
, representing the characters "L" and "annul".
That's no good! If someone comes up to you with a nice friendly L you don't want to reject their approach by signalling "annul" at them!
A better option is denote your default chirality by
"Q" and "Y".
I'm a Q, myself.
Attempts to synchronise chirality often result in
"Error" (LH and RH raised and lowered together)
- the windmilling approach discussed earlier. Although reducing the spontaneity of the occasion, the best tactic can be to retreat and make another attempt more slowly, rather than risk injury.
Be wary of huggers who approach with an
"S" - they could be coming in for a grope of the buttocks!
"Z" should only be attempted by experienced practitioners, as you could easily break an arm.
Note: Do not try hugging while holding actual signalling flags - you could have someone's eye out.
All diagrams were taken from this page, which is oddly sponsored by the Australian National Botanic Gardens.
One of the most useful hugging techniques I have learnt is that when something goes wrong, to smile and continue the hug as if there's no problem. The alternative, of leaping away and cringing, tends to leave the parties uncomfortable and self-conscious.
I like to save my cringing and falling through the floor moments for when I am safely on my own, and eventually become able to laugh at myself. Triggering events have included, as well as the crushing/elbowing mentioned above,
- the OMG he's much taller than I realised and I've accidentally grabbed his bum instead of his waist! hug
- and the aren't women's chests squashy? Isn't this weird? We should have gone in at a different angle! hug.
Thank you for reading - I hope this has been useful, or at least mildly entertaining. It is probably now time to punch someone on the shoulder and talk about sports.
When I fumble a hug in clumsy and graceless fashion, a typical failure mode is not achieving the complementary arm configuration. I approach - the huggee approaches. We raise our arms in preparation! I (say) have my left arm up (to go over the shoulder) and my right arm low (to go round the waist/torso): the huggee has mirrored this. Oh no! We're going to clash! Quickly, I move my left arm down and my right arm up so we will fit together - just as the huggee adjusts their position to fit mine! Aieee! By then it's too late and one person ends up smacking the other upside the nose with their elbow, or you do manage the hug but with one arm of the four crushed between you in a most uncomfortable angle.
It seems common for people to have a preferred angle, or chirality, for hugging. The semaphore flag code seems
a) an excellent way of denoting this, and
b) opens the mind to new hugging possibilities!
At first I thought the best representation of the hug approach pattern was one arm high, one arm low (the other positions are up, down, and out). This can be seen in
That's no good! If someone comes up to you with a nice friendly L you don't want to reject their approach by signalling "annul" at them!
A better option is denote your default chirality by
I'm a Q, myself.
Attempts to synchronise chirality often result in
- the windmilling approach discussed earlier. Although reducing the spontaneity of the occasion, the best tactic can be to retreat and make another attempt more slowly, rather than risk injury.
Be wary of huggers who approach with an
"Z" should only be attempted by experienced practitioners, as you could easily break an arm.
Note: Do not try hugging while holding actual signalling flags - you could have someone's eye out.
All diagrams were taken from this page, which is oddly sponsored by the Australian National Botanic Gardens.
One of the most useful hugging techniques I have learnt is that when something goes wrong, to smile and continue the hug as if there's no problem. The alternative, of leaping away and cringing, tends to leave the parties uncomfortable and self-conscious.
I like to save my cringing and falling through the floor moments for when I am safely on my own, and eventually become able to laugh at myself. Triggering events have included, as well as the crushing/elbowing mentioned above,
- the OMG he's much taller than I realised and I've accidentally grabbed his bum instead of his waist! hug
- and the aren't women's chests squashy? Isn't this weird? We should have gone in at a different angle! hug.
Thank you for reading - I hope this has been useful, or at least mildly entertaining. It is probably now time to punch someone on the shoulder and talk about sports.
(no subject)
(no subject)
It would be fascinating (if possible) to look at algorithms governing the decision-making process as two people meet for some sort of physical contact, incorporating the signals they use to convey intention and the way they identify and respond to the other signals. Are there inverse square laws? Are there delta function components? Can you track the initial trajectories and predict the outcome? Can you model the interaction of different base function types and propose optimum hug-approach behaviour for an encounter with no discontinuities? Do you see a hysteresis effect in repeated encounters?
Would this all work better or worse in zero gravity?
(no subject)
Worse fro hugging parties, better for "funny" video makers.
ps: fmz article! plokta obvious choice to send to...
(no subject)
Plokta publication = Sue Mason illos? They would be wonderful...
(no subject)
Not to mention second-guessing the two- or three-kiss routines.
And it's much easier to get from a handshake to a hug, if you decide that's what you do with that person, than to get back the other way...
(no subject)
I always get thrown by a second cheek - I can carry off one swoop with some nonchalance but I'm never expecting the second, even from a person who always does two.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Maybe I can incorporate future research ideas which arise on this first draft, and print an expanded version :-)
(no subject)
[flutters eyelashes at Bug in a I-need-Issue-2-done-by-Eastercon-and-I-haven't-started-it-yet sort of a way]
May I?
(no subject)
(no subject)
I find it hard to read when it is ended and time to disengage. And it can be difficult to disengage, as sometimes you find your arms pinioned to your sides!
(no subject)
(no subject)
Some people I tried, I could never find an equilibrium with.
(no subject)
(no subject)
*hugs*
(no subject)
However it has added to my confusion over how I feel about hugs because now as well as not being sure if I want to give and/or receive them I'm going to be worried about clashes where I'd never had that concern before!
(no subject)
I get fewer clashes when I act in pure recipient mode - I see the hugger approach and base my reaction on what would fit with them. But I get fewer hugs that way than when I take a more active part in initiating the hug.
I'm still fairly poor at initiating hugs, but I am a lot better at not running away and hiding when someone comes towards me with arms!
(Maybe if I get enough practice at this it will begin to feel as "natural" and "instinctive" as society leads us to expect so if we have trouble we think we're crap at being human. But I find I usually need to get through a perhaps over-analytic stage before I internalise the understanding (she says, over-analytically))
(no subject)
(no subject)
Damn you, woman! I was putting in an angle for this! [grin]
(no subject)
(no subject)
This is most amusing. mumblemutterandshouldbeinDemeter'sDaughtermuttermumble
(no subject)
(no subject)